Physical abuse
Hitting, pushing, over-medicating, chemical or physical restraints, sexual abuse (§ 15610.63).
When the people trusted to care for your parent hurt them instead — physically, through neglect, or by draining their savings — the law gives your family real power. We use it.
No recovery, no fee · Free consultation · Statewide California
Written and last reviewed by Adam C. Kocaj, Founding Attorney — CA Bar No. 321680, on , against the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (Welf. & Inst. Code §§ 15600–15675), Penal Code § 368, and California appellate decisions through 2026.
Talk to a lawyer about a civil case
Kocaj Law · (949) 807-4055Free, confidential consultation with Adam Kocaj
Definitions
Under California’s Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.07), elder abuse means physical abuse, neglect, abandonment, isolation, abduction, or other treatment that causes physical harm, pain, or mental suffering to a person 65 or older — plus financial abuse and the deprivation by a caregiver of goods or services needed to avoid harm. The same protections extend to “dependent adults” aged 18–64 whose disabilities limit their ability to protect themselves.
“Neglect” is broader than most families realize: it is the failure of anyone with care or custody of an elder to exercise reasonable care — including failing to provide medical care, food, clothing, shelter, hygiene, or protection from health and safety hazards (§ 15610.57). “Abandonment” means deserting an elder you have care of when a reasonable person would have kept providing it (§ 15610.05).
Hitting, pushing, over-medicating, chemical or physical restraints, sexual abuse (§ 15610.63).
Bedsores, dehydration, malnutrition, filth, untreated infections, fall after fall (§ 15610.57).
Taking or keeping an elder’s money or property by wrongful use, fraud, or undue influence (§ 15610.30).
Cutting an elder off from family, mail, or visitors; deserting them (§§ 15610.43, 15610.05).
Reporting
The short answer: if the elder is in immediate danger, call 911. If the abuse is happening at home or anywhere in the community, call Adult Protective Services (APS) at 1-833-401-0832 — the statewide, 24/7 line that routes to your county — or use your county’s online reporting portal. If it is happening in a nursing home, assisted living facility, or any licensed long-term care facility, call the Long-Term Care Ombudsman CRISISline at 1-800-231-4024 (24/7). Any suspected crime — theft, assault, false imprisonment — should also go to the local police or sheriff.
You do not have to pick the “perfect” agency. California law requires APS, the Ombudsman, and law enforcement to cross-report to each other (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15640), so a good-faith report to any of them starts the process. For suspected abuse in a Medi-Cal-funded facility, the California Attorney General’s Division of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse also takes reports at 1-800-722-0432, and nursing-home licensing complaints can be filed with the California Department of Public Health district office for your county.
| Where the abuse happened | Report to | Number / method |
|---|---|---|
| Anywhere — emergency | 911 / local police | Call 911; police handle all criminal abuse and cross-report |
| Home or community | Adult Protective Services (county) | 1-833-401-0832, 24/7 statewide; county online portals |
| Nursing home, assisted living, board & care | Long-Term Care Ombudsman | CRISISline 1-800-231-4024, 24/7 |
| Nursing home — licensing violation | CA Dept. of Public Health (CDPH) | District office complaint (phone or online) |
| Medi-Cal facility fraud or abuse | CA Attorney General (DMFEA) | 1-800-722-0432 or online form |
| Financial abuse — any setting | APS + police; banks must also report | 1-833-401-0832; banks/brokers are mandated reporters (§§ 15630.1–.2) |
Yes. Any member of the public may report suspected elder abuse in California, and the reporter’s identity is confidential by law — disclosable only by court order or to specified investigative agencies (Welf. & Inst. Code §§ 15633, 15633.5). Good-faith reporters are immune from civil and criminal liability; a voluntary (non-mandated) reporter faces liability only for a report they knew was false (§ 15634). Practical tip: even an anonymous report is more actionable with specifics — dates, names, injuries, account activity, photos.
“Mandated reporters” — anyone who has assumed full or intermittent care or custody of an elder, plus facility staff, health practitioners, clergy, and APS and law-enforcement employees — must report known or suspected abuse immediately or as soon as practicably possible by phone or the confidential online tool, with a written report within two working days (§ 15630). Inside long-term care facilities the clock is tighter: for serious physical abuse, a verbal report to law enforcement within 2 hours and written reports within 24 hours to the Ombudsman, law enforcement, and the licensing agency. Bank employees, broker-dealers, and investment advisers are mandated reporters of financial abuse (§§ 15630.1, 15630.2), and a financial institution faces civil penalties up to $1,000 — $5,000 if willful — for failing to report.
Facilities
Nursing home abuse is any act — and neglect is any failure to act — by a facility or its staff that harms a resident: physical or sexual abuse, chemical restraint, and above all the quiet injuries of understaffing: pressure ulcers (bedsores), dehydration and malnutrition, repeated falls, medication errors, untreated infections that become sepsis, and residents who wander unsupervised. California requires skilled nursing facilities to provide at least 3.5 direct care hours per resident per day (Health & Safety Code § 1276.65); chronic understaffing below that floor is often the root cause a jury never gets told about — unless your lawyer proves it.
Bedsores at the tailbone or heels, unexplained bruises or fractures, rapid weight loss, poor hygiene, dehydration.
Fear of specific staff, withdrawal, sudden decline, sedation that doesn’t match the chart.
Vague chart entries, missing records, injuries “discovered” at shift change, delayed 911 calls, unreturned calls from the family.
Yes. A resident — or the family of a resident who has died — can sue a nursing home, assisted living facility, or its corporate owners. California’s Elder Abuse Act adds remedies ordinary negligence cases don’t have: if you prove the facility acted with recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice by clear and convincing evidence, the facility pays your attorney’s fees and costs, and the elder’s pre-death pain and suffering remains recoverable even after death (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15657; Delaney v. Baker (1999) 20 Cal.4th 23; Covenant Care v. Superior Court (2004) 32 Cal.4th 771). Facilities cannot make residents waive these fee rights in an admission agreement (Bickel v. Sunrise Assisted Living (2012)). Neglect claims require a caretaking or custodial relationship (Winn v. Pioneer Medical Group (2016)) — which a nursing home always has.
There is no honest “average.” Value is driven by the severity and permanence of the injury, whether the elder died, the egregiousness of the conduct (which opens punitive damages), the strength of the staffing and charting evidence, the corporate structure behind the facility, and the county where the case is tried. Two structural features push these cases up: the Act’s one-way attorney’s-fee award makes even moderate-damages cases economically viable, and understaffing evidence can turn a “bad outcome” defense into a recklessness finding. A note of candor: in claims against healthcare providers based on professional negligence, California’s MICRA cap can limit non-economic damages — one of several reasons the difference between pleading ordinary malpractice and pleading elder abuse, correctly, changes what a case is worth. We evaluate that for free.
Financial abuse
Financial elder abuse occurs when anyone takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains an elder’s money or property — or assists someone who does — for a wrongful use, with intent to defraud, or by undue influence (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.30). A taking is “wrongful” if the person knew or should have known it was likely to harm the elder — an objective standard; the victim does not have to prove the abuser acted in bad faith (Cameron v. Las Orchidias Properties (2022)). The statute reaches caregivers who “borrow,” relatives who rewrite estate plans, agents under a power of attorney, trustees and conservators, and businesses whose transactions strip an elder’s assets — even changes procured by agreement, gift, or will.
California stacks the remedies deliberately, to make these cases worth bringing:
| Remedy | What it takes | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Full compensatory damages | Proof of financial abuse by a preponderance of the evidence | Welf. & Inst. Code § 15657.5(a) |
| Attorney’s fees & costs — mandatory, one-way | Same preponderance showing; only the plaintiff can recover fees | § 15657.5(a); Arace (2020); Wood (2007) |
| Pain-and-suffering damages that survive death | Clear and convincing evidence of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice | § 15657.5(b); CCP § 377.34 limits lifted |
| Punitive damages | Clear and convincing evidence of oppression, fraud, or malice | Civ. Code § 3294; Cameron (2022) |
| Double damages | Bad-faith taking of property belonging to an elder | Prob. Code § 859; Levin (2019) |
| Treble (triple) damages — certain cases | Senior-targeted unfair or deceptive practices where the remedy is a penalty | Civ. Code § 3345; Clark v. Superior Court (2010) |
| Pre-judgment asset freeze (writ of attachment) | Filed financial-abuse claim for damages | § 15657.01 |
| Elder abuse restraining order | Preponderance showing; can also tag debts as abuse-incurred | § 15657.03; Newman v. Casey (2024) |
Criminal exposure
It can be. Penal Code § 368 makes elder abuse a “wobbler” — prosecutors charge it as a felony or a misdemeanor depending on the conduct, the harm, and the amount taken. A civil lawsuit for damages is separate: your family can pursue compensation whether or not the District Attorney files charges, and a criminal case is never a prerequisite.
| Conduct (Penal Code § 368) | Felony exposure | Misdemeanor exposure |
|---|---|---|
| Physical abuse likely to cause great bodily harm or death | 2, 3, or 4 years state prison; fine up to $6,000 | Up to 1 year county jail; fine up to $6,000 |
| — victim suffers great bodily injury | +3 years (victim under 70); +5 years (victim 70+) | — |
| — abuse proximately causes death | +5 years (under 70); +7 years (70+) | — |
| Other physical abuse / endangerment | — | Up to 1 year; fine up to $2,000 |
| Theft, embezzlement, fraud, forgery, identity theft over $950 | 2, 3, or 4 years; fine up to $10,000 | Up to 1 year; fine up to $2,500 |
| Same, $950 or less | — | Up to 1 year; fine up to $1,000 |
| False imprisonment by violence, menace, fraud, or deceit | 2, 3, or 4 years | — |
Courts can also impose post-conviction no-contact restraining orders lasting up to 10 years. Penal Code § 368’s financial-crime penalty structure was last updated effective January 1, 2025.
Building the case
A civil financial elder abuse claim has three elements, proven by a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not): (1) the victim was 65+ or a dependent adult; (2) the defendant took, kept, or helped take the elder’s property; and (3) the taking was for a wrongful use, with intent to defraud, or by undue influence (§§ 15610.30, 15657.5). “Undue influence” means excessive persuasion that overcomes free will — the law looks at the victim’s vulnerability, the influencer’s apparent authority, the tactics used, and the unfairness of the result (§ 15610.70; Lintz v. Lintz (2014)). For physical abuse and neglect, the enhanced remedies require the higher clear-and-convincing showing of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice — unless the new spoliation rule applies (see below).
The evidence that wins these cases: bank and brokerage records showing unusual withdrawals or transfers; estate-plan changes made late in life or during cognitive decline; medical records and testimony on the elder’s capacity; proof of a confidential or fiduciary relationship; isolation of the elder from family; facility staffing logs and time-punch data; the chart itself — and what’s missing from it. We move early to preserve records, freeze assets by writ of attachment where the statute allows, and get protective orders in place while the case is built.
Time limits
Financial elder abuse: four years from when the abuse was, or reasonably should have been, discovered (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15657.7). Physical abuse and neglect claims generally follow the two-year personal-injury deadline (CCP § 335.1) — but shorter clocks can hide inside a case: claims sounding in professional negligence against healthcare providers can face MICRA’s one-year-from- discovery limit (CCP § 340.5), and a claim against a county-run facility can require a government claim within six months (Gov. Code § 911.2). If the elder has died, wrongful-death deadlines run too. The safe answer is always the same: have a lawyer calendar every applicable deadline now — the consultation is free.
| Claim | Deadline | Clock starts |
|---|---|---|
| Financial elder abuse | 4 years | Discovery of the abuse (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15657.7) |
| Physical abuse / neglect (injury) | 2 years | Date of injury (CCP § 335.1) |
| Professional negligence overlay (MICRA) | 1 year / 3 years | Discovery / date of injury (CCP § 340.5) |
| Public (government-run) facility | 6-month claim first | Date of harm (Gov. Code § 911.2) |
2026 development
Effective January 1, 2026, new Welfare and Institutions Code § 15657.02 (AB 251) changes the math in facility cases. Normally, the Elder Abuse Act’s enhanced remedies — attorney’s fees and survival of pain-and-suffering damages — require clear and convincing evidence of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice. Under the new law, if a judge or arbitrator finds that a covered facility (skilled nursing and specified residential and community care facilities) committed spoliation of evidence — intentionally altering, concealing, or destroying records in a way that materially prejudices the resident’s case — the plaintiff may prove the claim by a preponderance of the evidence instead. In plain English: facilities that shred, “lose,” or rewrite the chart can no longer hide behind the higher burden of proof their own destruction of evidence made impossible to meet. Few firms are litigating this statute yet; we intend to.
FAQ
Call 911 if the elder is in immediate danger. Otherwise report community abuse to Adult Protective Services at 1-833-401-0832 (24/7 statewide, routed to your county) and facility abuse — nursing homes, assisted living, board and care — to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman CRISISline at 1-800-231-4024. Suspected crimes should also go to local police. The agencies cross-report to each other by law (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15640), so any good-faith report starts the process.
It depends on where the abuse happened. Home or community: APS (1-833-401-0832). Licensed long-term care facility: the Ombudsman (1-800-231-4024) — APS will redirect facility reports there. Any crime, any location: police or sheriff (911 in emergencies). Licensing complaints about a nursing home also go to the California Department of Public Health; Medi-Cal facility abuse can be reported to the Attorney General at 1-800-722-0432.
Yes. Anyone may report, reporter identities are confidential under Welf. & Inst. Code §§ 15633–15633.5, and good-faith reporters are immune from civil and criminal liability (§ 15634). A non-mandated reporter risks liability only for a knowingly false report. Include as much detail as you can — dates, names, injuries, transactions — so investigators can act without needing to call you back.
Report it to APS at 1-833-401-0832 (or your county's online portal) and to local law enforcement — financial abuse is both a civil wrong and a crime under Penal Code § 368. Alert the elder's bank or broker too: their employees are mandated reporters (§§ 15630.1, 15630.2) and can freeze suspicious activity. Then talk to a lawyer about the civil claim, which carries mandatory attorney's fees and a possible pre-judgment asset freeze; reporting alone does not recover the money.
Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.07 defines it as physical abuse, neglect, abandonment, isolation, abduction, or other treatment causing physical harm, pain, or mental suffering to an elder — plus financial abuse and a caregiver's deprivation of necessities. It covers acts and failures to act, at home and in facilities, by strangers, family members, caregivers, and corporations alike.
65. An "elder" is any California resident aged 65 or older (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.27). Similar protections cover "dependent adults" aged 18–64 whose physical or mental limitations restrict their ability to carry out normal activities or protect their rights (Penal Code § 368; § 15610.23).
Taking, hiding, appropriating, obtaining, or retaining an elder's money or property — or helping someone do it — for a wrongful use, with intent to defraud, or by undue influence (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.30). Common forms: caregiver "loans," POA self-dealing, late-life will and trust changes, deed transfers, sweetheart scams, and predatory sales. The abuser's "good intentions" are not a defense; the test is whether they knew or should have known the taking was likely to harm the elder.
A facility's failure to provide the care a reasonable caregiver would: turning and repositioning (bedsores), hydration and nutrition, fall prevention, medication management, infection care, supervision of residents who wander, and basic hygiene (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.57). Understaffing below California's 3.5 direct-care-hours daily minimum (Health & Safety Code § 1276.65) is frequently the underlying cause — and strong evidence in a civil case.
It can be. Penal Code § 368 is a wobbler: felony elder abuse carries 2, 3, or 4 years in state prison — with enhancements adding up to 7 more years where the victim suffers great bodily injury or dies, and higher terms when the victim is 70 or older. Prosecutors may instead charge a misdemeanor (up to 1 year in county jail). Financial abuse over $950 can be charged as a felony.
Criminally: theft, embezzlement, fraud, forgery, or identity theft against an elder over $950 is punishable by 2, 3, or 4 years and a fine up to $10,000 as a felony (or up to 1 year and $2,500 as a misdemeanor); $950 or less is a misdemeanor with up to 1 year and $1,000 (Penal Code § 368(d), (e)). Civilly — and this is where families recover — the abuser pays full damages plus mandatory attorney's fees, with punitive, double (Prob. Code § 859), and in some cases treble damages on top.
For financial abuse: show by a preponderance of the evidence that a person took or kept the property of someone 65+ for a wrongful use, with fraudulent intent, or by undue influence (§§ 15610.30, 15657.5). For physical abuse or neglect with enhanced remedies: clear and convincing evidence of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice (§ 15657) — unless the facility spoliated records, which now drops the burden to preponderance (§ 15657.02, eff. 2026). The proof lives in bank records, charts, staffing logs, capacity evidence, and witnesses — preserved early.
The claim survives. The personal representative — or heirs, the successor in interest, and other interested persons if there is none — has standing to sue (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15657.3(d); Estate of Lowrie (2004)). Proof follows the same elements, built from financial records, estate-plan changes, medical capacity evidence, and testimony about the relationship. With clear and convincing proof of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice, the estate can even recover the elder's pre-death pain and suffering (§ 15657.5(b)).
Yes — residents and families sue nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and their parent companies. The Elder Abuse Act adds remedies negligence alone doesn't: mandatory attorney's fees and survival of pain-and-suffering damages on a showing of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice (§ 15657; Delaney v. Baker). Admission-agreement fee waivers are unenforceable (Bickel (2012)). Cases can proceed whether or not regulators cite the facility, and a criminal case is not required.
It depends on the injury's severity and permanence, whether the elder died, how egregious the conduct was (punitive damages), the documentary and staffing evidence, the defendant's corporate structure and insurance, and venue. The Act's one-way fee award changes the economics in the family's favor, while MICRA can cap non-economic damages in claims framed as medical negligence — so how the case is pled matters enormously. No honest lawyer quotes an "average"; we give you a case-specific range after a free evaluation.
Sometimes. Civil Code § 3345 allows trebling of remedies that are penalties in actions by or on behalf of seniors to redress unfair or deceptive practices; the Supreme Court held it cannot treble ordinary restitution (Clark v. Superior Court (2010) 50 Cal.4th 605). In practice the bigger multipliers in elder financial abuse cases are Probate Code § 859 double damages for bad-faith takings, punitive damages under Civil Code § 3294, and mandatory attorney's fees under § 15657.5 — stacked together where the facts support them.
Yes — twice over. First, standing survives: the personal representative, or specified heirs, successors, and interested persons, can start or continue the lawsuit (§ 15657.3(d)). Second, damages survive: unlike ordinary tort claims limited by CCP § 377.34, proof of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice by clear and convincing evidence preserves the elder's pre-death pain-and-suffering damages (§ 15657.5(b)). Death does not buy the abuser a discount.
Financial elder abuse: 4 years from discovery (§ 15657.7). Physical abuse or neglect: generally 2 years (CCP § 335.1), but MICRA's 1-year discovery rule can apply to professional-negligence theories against healthcare providers (CCP § 340.5), and government-run facilities require a claim within 6 months (Gov. Code § 911.2). Because the shortest clock controls the strategy, get deadlines calendared by a lawyer immediately.
APS and the Ombudsman investigate and protect — they can intervene, refer for prosecution, and connect services, but they do not recover your family's losses. A civil lawsuit is how the money comes back: compensatory damages, attorney's fees, punitive, double, or treble damages, and asset freezes. Do both: report first so the elder is safe, then preserve the civil claim before records disappear and deadlines run.
AB 251 added Welf. & Inst. Code § 15657.02, effective January 1, 2026. If a judge or arbitrator finds a covered facility — skilled nursing and specified residential and community care facilities — intentionally altered, concealed, or destroyed records in a way that materially prejudices the case, the plaintiff may prove the enhanced-remedies claim by a preponderance of the evidence instead of clear and convincing evidence. Details in the 2026 law section above.
Nothing up front and nothing unless we win — we handle elder abuse and nursing home cases on contingency, and the consultation is free. California law reinforces that: prevailing elder abuse plaintiffs recover attorney's fees from the abuser (§§ 15657, 15657.5), which is exactly why the Legislature wrote the statute — to make sure families like yours can afford to fight.
Related practice areas
Many elder abuse cases overlap with the areas below. Explore related representation we offer across California.
When neglect or abuse takes a life, surviving family can pursue both wrongful death and survival claims.
Learn about Wrongful DeathFacility and provider care that falls below the standard of care — and how MICRA interacts with elder abuse claims.
Learn about Medical MalpracticeFalls, unsafe conditions, and negligent supervision on property, including care facilities.
Learn about Premises LiabilityWrongful termination, wage theft, discrimination, and retaliation claims for California employees — including care-facility staff fired for reporting abuse.
Learn about Employment LawNo Recovery. No Fee.
You pay nothing unless we recover for you. Speak directly with Adam Kocaj today.